Gmail Calendar Docs Reader La Web Más »
Grupos visitados recientemente | Ayuda | Acceder
Página principal de Grupos de Google
Mensaje del debate Tommy Davis: Scientology avoids membership estimates
El grupo al cual envías entradas es un grupo Usenet. Si envías mensajes a este grupo, cualquier usuario de Internet podrá ver tu dirección de correo electrónico
Tu respuesta no se ha enviado.
Tu entrada se ha publicado correctamente.
 
De:
Para:
Cc:
Seguimiento:
Añadir Cc | Añadir seguimiento | Editar asunto
Asunto:
Validación:
Con fines de verificación, escribe los caracteres que veas en la imagen siguiente o los números que escuches haciendo clic en el icono de accesibilidad. Escucha y escribe los números que oyes.
 
Eldon  
Ver perfil   Traducir al Traducido (ver original)
 Más opciones 5 nov 2009, 06:23
Grupos de noticias: alt.religion.scientology
De: Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com>
Fecha: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:23:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Jue 5 nov 2009 06:23
Asunto: Re: Tommy Davis: Scientology avoids membership estimates
On Nov 4, 9:53 pm, Astrid <Astrid7777...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Nov 4, 12:42 pm, Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com> wrote:

> > Davis said that while the church avoids membership estimates, it's
> > "absolutely in the millions" globally and growing in the U.S.

> Davis is "absolutely" brainwashed if he believes that. I'm sure he
> picks up a vibe of excitement about Scientology in Hollywood, and
> thinks it is like that everywhere. Why is a cult that is so stat-
> obsessed in other respects -- right down to taking notes of every
> auditing session and keeping them on file, or miles of wire used in
> the Ft. Brainwash renovation  -- yet so disorganized they can't keep a
> database of people currently taking Scientology courses, or holding
> some kind of simple membership.

As Ray sardonically implied, they have been spewing out numbers of 8,
10 and 12 million members ever since Heber appeared on the disastrous
60 Minutes show back in 1985. They know exactly what the stats are
right now, but they ain't talkin' no mo'.

> I think this whole aspect of stats constitutes why it is so damn hard
> to get off their mailing list. Once you are taken off, you can't be
> part of someone's stats as an active member, and instead some drone is
> held accountable for the decline. Is that a good stat to tell your
> supervisor: "I took 40 pissed-off people off the mailing list today."
> Hip hip hurray!

They're scraping the bottom of the barrel. Not long ago, a guy who
left the Sea Org well  over 20 years ago, and is entirely disaffected,
received a few phone calls. Poor phone registrars.

    Reenviar  
Debes registrarte antes de enviar mensajes.
Para enviar una entrada, antes deberás formar parte del grupo.
Antes de enviar entradas, actualiza tu alias en la configuración de la suscripción.
No dispones del permiso necesario para enviar entradas.

Crear un grupo - Grupos de Google - Página principal de Google - Condiciones del servicio - Política de privacidad
©2010 Google